Pages

Sunday, November 21, 2010

Sanjay Subramaiam at Nadhasurabhi (22nd nov 2010)

Difficult to keep short a review of Sanjay’s concert. However I shall try to do so.

Vidwan Sanjay Subrahmanyan     Vocal
Vidwan Mysore Nagaraj               Violin
Vidwan Tumkur B.Ravishankar   Mridangam
Vidwan Guruprasanna                 Khanjira

@ Nadasurabhi Annual Music Festival – 2010
Sanjay was at his ever best. I know I say this after every concert of his. But that’s what he does. He keeps the crowd spell bound by his creative explorations. Nothing seems to be left behind to explore! There was tradition, innovation, excellence and an effortless blend of the trio on stage at Nadasurabhi  by Vid. Sanjay Subramaniam today. 

-Varnam - Hindolam
-Shankari neeve - begada
-O raajeevaksha - Aarabhi
-Kanthimathi karuna - kalyani
-Niravadi sukhada - Ravichandrika
-Kori sevimparada – kharaharapriya
-RTP – Tilang, hamsanandi, kadanakuthoohalam, vakulabharanam, bhagyashree
-Ninnaye rathi endru - bhagyashree
-Nanda tanaya govinda - bhagyashree
-Tunbam nergayil – desh
-Mangalam(Pavamana) - sowrashtra

He kept the varnam simple. Subbaraya Shastry’s shankari neeve in begada was a neat presentation. Aarabhi was very articulate. The expressions mirrored fertile imagination. References were peeking in from Sandhinchane swara patterns, yet maintained striking difference. There was a full import of kalyani ragam in “kanthimathi karuna”. The aalapana reflected traditional kalyani  and the krithi was handled with due care considering its vilamba pace. Niravadi sukhada was delightful. Alapana in ravichandrika is a rarity. Sanjay’s committed endeavors in the various departments of this piece kept the interest of the audience high. Neraval at “maamava marakatha” was most welcoming. The 3 swara edupu at mamava-marakatha gives a beautiful space for swara exploration and Sanjay made every bit of it. Then came kharaharapriya. This raga seldom needs extra effort to beautify it; Sanjay glorified the raga. Neraval at pallavi “ Oh rajeevaksha Orajupula juchedha”  was exemplary and had fitting swara prasthara. This was followed by thani.

Pallavi in thilang was surprising. Thilang is mostly set aside as a ragam for the last part of the concerts like devaranamam, abhang, bharathiyar padal. But Sanjay proved that Thilang could dress the center stage of the concert. 2 nishadhas were shown visibly. Thanam was handled with dignity and finesse. The pallavi “Ninnaye rathi endru ninaikiren adi kannamma” though set to a simple talam – chatusra triputa (adi), had its start at atheetha(begins 1 swara behind the tala starting) making it demanding. Pallavi ragamalika encompassed Hamsanandi, kadanakuthoohalam, vakulabharanam and bhagyashree. He interpreted Subramanya Bharathi’s “ninnaye rathi endru” in bhagyashree with the same grit. This was followed by a kannada krithi, yet again in bhagyashree “nanda tanaya gOvindana”. Tunbam nergayil in Desh was the concluding piece. His lucid tamil diction conveyed clearly the meaning of the lyrics with the needed sentiment.

At some point during the RTP, Sanjay paused to say that he couldn’t match to the speed of Sri Nagaraj’s playing to which Nagaraj modestly said - what he was playing today was because of Sanjay’s splendid singing. This reflected Sanjay’s humility. How unassuming! Vid. Mysore Nagaraj’s simple personality contrasts to his violin’s astounding virtuosity and outstanding imagination. Thani avarthanam enveloped a beautiful conversation between Vid. Ravishankar’s mridangam and Vid. Guruprasanna’s khanjira. The percussion vidwans added to the enthusiasm of the main artiste and gave the extra ingredients making the concert a complete success.

Concert highlights: Krithi selections, Rare raga pallavi (thilang), Sanjay’s style and free expressions

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

Conversation with God : A drift in the line of thought


At the entrance of HIS abode, a man has this spat with his Lord who denies him entry into heaven.

-------------
So, this man said…
( With a voice of certainty
And a gesture of mellowness )                             

“ I was sent with nothing
And I had nothing to bring back to you…. “

God replied…

“ I gave you everything
But you are left with nothing to carry now; a crook, loser – you are disputing with me?”

Man argued…

“ You just tossed me down, I had a naught.
You gave me not anything, I earned my life”

God disagreed…

“ I gave you …
A family to care
A place to share
Warmth to bear
Fabric to wear ”

God waited; the man had nothing to retort
HE continued..

I bestowed on you …
“ Unconditional love
Unbridled attention
Uncrated freedom
Limitless peace ”     

The man continued his silence…
With a fragile voice, he then asked…

“ What I ought to do now to seek an entry? Don’t make me stand at your gateway as a keeper;  give me a way-out ”

God spoke - “You still hunt for favors from me and end up saying I gave you nothing”. Here is the last I have to suggest, trail back and earn all that you lost in the journey. When you have everything that I gave you, I shall consider letting you in”

-------------
The man wakes up(from his dream) with a jerk and sighs “I thought God is considerate, but He has a note of everything that He loaned me. I may end up incisive-ing on  the lost things for an entire life more. I hope my friends are wise enough not to lose the fine things that God has bestowed on us and later blame Him like I did  -
- Happiness which I lost to greed
- Attention (rampant spotlight that we get as a kid) that I lost to the crave for hyped focus
- Peace of mind which I lost fancying for material things and
- Love which got subdued by hatred due to competition with my own people.
In case you, my friends, line-up with me, start gearing up and keen for the things that you have lost before it gets too late. God may not give everyone a second chance”

A drift in the regular grain of thought :
We usually get to hear this : “We come to Earth with an empty hand and take back nothing when we leave”.
How about this line of thought?  “When born, we are bestowed with everything, but we gradually lose them to the material pleasures. It’s our duty to take them back than go void”

------------------
Any thoughts?  Favoring or contrasting – Most welcome :)